The Nest Nursery. LLC

2026

1. High riskStandard 7.105/12/2026

   7.10(05) — Care of Children

   The program did not provide adequate supervision of children on the day of the visit. There were no educators in the classroom when a child was sleeping in a crib. Corrective action: Thank you for discussing the supervision concern observed during the visit. I appreciate the opportunity to provide additional context regarding the incident. At the time of the observation, the child involved [redacted] asleep safely in a crib, and the educator remained within immediate hearing distance of the classroom while briefly stepping away to retrieve a snack and copies from the machine. We attest the child in ear shot. The child [redacted] during this time and remained in a secure sleep environment. I understand that 606 CMR 7.10(5) requires educators to provide “appropriate supervision” at all times and states that educators must: • be in sufficient proximity to intervene quickly when necessary, • maximize their ability to see and/or hear children, • and remain aware of children’s activities at all times. In this instance, the educator exercised judgment that the child remained safe, within hearing range, and capable of immediate response if needed. Our understanding of the regulation is that it establishes a standard of “appropriate supervision,” rather than an explicit requirement that an educator remain physically inside the classroom every moment when a child [redacted] is asleep in a crib. I would also respectfully note that the current regulations do not explicitly state that staff are never permitted to briefly step outside a classroom while maintaining hearing proximity and immediate ability to respond. If EEC’s interpretation is that educators must remain physically inside the classroom at all times regardless of circumstances, even for a child [redacted] who is asleep safely in a crib, it may be helpful for the regulations or written policy guidance to more explicitly state that expectation so that programs can apply the standard consistently. At the same time, I understand EEC’s expectation regarding continuous supervision and recognize the importance of ensuring that supervision practices are interpreted consistently. Moving forward, we have reinforced procedures to ensure classroom coverage is maintained whenever an educator briefly exits a room, even in circumstances involving a single sleeping child. Thank you for your time and continued guidance. I do believe this did needed to be addressed and thank you for your conversation around the matter. It will not happen again. Sincerely,. Regulation: Supervision of Children: In addition to interacting with children as required by 606 CMR 7.05, all licensees and educators must exercise appropriate supervision of the children in their care in order to ensure their health and safety at all times. Such supervision must include, but not be limited to, indoor and outdoor activities, mealtimes, naptime, transportation, field trips, and transitions between activities. Cited during: Provisional License Renewal Visit. Source: MA EEC child care provider record (childcare.mass.gov).

   Corrected 6/3/2026
2. High riskStandard 7.044/8/2026

   7.04(01), 7.04(17)(m)(07) — Administration

   There was not a qualified administrator or a qualified person designated in charge on site when the licensor arrived to the program. Corrective action: This was addressed and noted as we miss interpreted the regulations. Director will remain on the premises even if there are only two children in care and two teachers on site. The Director or Lead Teacher will not move between programs, regardless of low enrollment.. Regulation: The licensee must ensure that the program is soundly administered by qualified persons designated with specific administrative and program responsibilities. The licensee may admit children only in accordance with the provisions of the license., Provisions for Temporary Absence of Administrator. The licensee shall inform all staff on duty as to who is responsible for administration of the program at any given time. Cited during: Provisional License 90-day Monitoring Visit. Source: MA EEC child care provider record (childcare.mass.gov).

   Corrected 4/17/2026
3. Medium-High riskStandard 7.074/8/2026

   7.07(07)(d), 7.07(07)(e), 7.07(10), 7.07(13)(d) — Physical Facility - Outdoors

   It was observed that there was a hazard in the outdoor space. The wooden structure with the swing and slide was not anchored below the surface, there was no protective surface in the fall zones under and around the equipment, and the structure did not contain signage or manufacturer's information to indicate age use or that it was commercial equipment. Corrective action: We had no plans to use this structure. We have not used the structure as it was noted in the previous visit that it was inadequate. We had not removed it as it was frozen in the ground. It will be moved this weekend.. Regulation: The outdoor play area must be free from hazards including but not limited to: a busy street, a parking lot, poisonous plants, water hazards, debris, broken glass, chipping, peeling or flaking paint, dangerous machinery or tools, and weather-related and environmental hazards or small objects that could present a choking hazard to young children. Any such hazard must be removed or fenced by a sturdy, permanently installed barrier which is at least four feet high or otherwise protected or removed, as appropriate., If the outdoor play space is located on a roof, it must be protected by a barrier at least seven feet high, which cannot be climbed by children., Indoor Space. The indoor space must be clean, safely maintained, well-ventilated and well-lit, of sufficient size for the children served, and must encourage play and learning., All play equipment, fences and structures must be free of entrapment hazards. Cited during: Provisional License 90-day Monitoring Visit. Source: MA EEC child care provider record (childcare.mass.gov).

   Corrected 4/17/2026